3621 W MacArthur Blvd Suite 107 Santa Ana, CA 92704
Toll Free – (844)-500-1351 Local – (714)-604-1416 Fax – (714)-907-1115

California should reject absurd banking bill about guns

Rent Computer Hardware You Need, When You Need It

Sen. Dave Min, D-Irvine, has proposed legislation that would prohibit banks which “do business with gun manufacturers from doing business with the state of California,” as the current text of Senate Bill 637 states. Min pretends the bill is about gun violence. But it would do more to promote Min’s upcoming congressional campaign than it would meaningfully address gun violence.

“SB 637 will force Wall Street to make a choice between the blood money offered by the gun industry and doing business with the state of California, sending a clear message and more importantly a strong market signal that the state of California will not, either directly or indirectly, finance gun violence,” Min said in a statement announcing the bill last week.

This sort of hysterical rhetoric is not a serious response to the very real and serious problem of gun violence in California across the country.

For one, it calls on banks to discriminate against lawful businesses simply because some politicians in government don’t like the sort of products being sold. That is an improper use of government power.

There are other problems, too. “The goal of this bill obviously is to drive the firearm industry out of existence, and with it the ability of law-abiding Americans to exercise their right to acquire firearms for lawful purposes including self-protection,” argues Larry Keane from the National Shooting Sports Foundation in a recent commentary. “It would shutter the industry that provides the tools law enforcement uses to protect America’s communities and the U.S. military to defend the homeland.”

Indeed, as much as Min doesn’t like it, the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms. The overwhelming majority of gun owners and gun purchasers are exercising their constitutional right to protect themselves.

By contrast, it is commonly the case — perhaps even mostly the case — that those who use guns in the course of criminal activity are already not allowed to have them in the first place.

This is not the first time Dave Min has used the power of legislation for a hollow political stunt. Last year, the Legislature approved his bill SB 915 to ban the sale of firearms on state property, with the chief target being gun shows on fairgrounds. As pointed out by the Rural County Representatives of California, “Throughout the nation, there has been no evidence of firearms being obtained improperly at a county fairground property. SB 915 simply creates winners and losers in the retail firearm industry, and would drive firearm consumers to other retailers, including those that operate out-of-state.”

Related Articles

Opinion |


The simple solution to America’s coming demographic challenge

Opinion |


Julie Su, key figure in California’s EDD fraud scandal, is Joe Biden’s latest problem child

Opinion |


‘Just say no’ to ban on tobacco sales in California. Reject Assembly Bill 395.

Opinion |


California is spending more than ever to reduce homelessness, but its current strategy is not working

Opinion |


Labor unions, workers and the need to think outside the box

Alas, what Dave Min was after was a cheap legislative victory which gives the illusion that he’s fighting gun violence when all he’s actually doing is using the real problem of gun violence for cheap political points. Reject the stunts. Reject SB 637.

Generated by Feedzy